Category

AI & Automation

15 insights

Stepped area chart showing professional services AI adoption at 56% of firms stepping down to 24% at firm-wide deployment, illustrating the redesign gap.

The Firms Getting the Most From AI Rebuilt the Workflow, Then Automated It

Professional services leads on AI adoption, but only about a quarter deploy firm-wide. The difference is workflow redesign, not tools. What the leading quartile did differently.
View Insight
Dot grid chart comparing 17 percent of organizations with AI agents deployed today against 64 percent expecting to deploy within two years, from the 2026 Gartner CIO and Technology Executive Survey.

Agentic Projects Do Not Fail on Capability. They Fail on Scope.

More than 40% of agentic AI projects are forecast to be canceled by 2027, and escalating cost leads the causes. Why open scope, not capability, is what ends most agentic builds.
View Insight
Bullet bar chart showing that 56 percent of leaders want greater visibility into AI agent behavior, 44 percent want proven risk frameworks and 42 percent want proof in their own environment, against only 28 percent who are highly confident deploying AI agents securely.

You Cannot Scale an Agent You Cannot Watch

Agentic AI pilots in lending stall at one workflow because no one can produce a record of what the agent did. Why observability, not model quality, is the constraint on scaling.
View Insight
Line chart showing firm-level AI adoption across OECD member economies rising from 8.7% in 2023 to 14.2% in 2024 to 20.2% in 2025, with professional services at 36.8% in 2025.

The Second Price of AI Is Your Firm's Process

Firms protect client data with sophisticated rigor and classify their own process knowledge not at all. Adoption is compounding at 20.2% of firms, 36.8% in professional services. The method gets encoded either way.
View Insight
Threshold curve showing the return on an agentic workflow rising with how often the workflow runs. The curve stays flat below roughly fifty runs per week, labelled the preference zone, and climbs steeply above that inflection, labelled the project zone.

The First Agent Never Belongs at the Front Door

The largest US banks put AI agents in client vetting and transaction accounting, not the storefront. Three tests decide where a lender's first agent actually earns its keep.
View Insight
Bullet-bar chart showing 75% of small professional services firms use AI while only 31% report a revenue increase, illustrating the gap between adoption and payoff.

Adoption Is Not Transformation. Most Professional Services Firms Bought the First and Skipped the Second.

Three-quarters of small professional services firms use AI. A third saw revenue move. The gap is not the tools, it is the unrebuilt operation the tools run inside.
View Insight
Workflow diagram contrasting two AI oversight models in lending: blanket human review of every file, versus exception routing where 60 to 80 percent of standard files clear straight through and only exceptions reach a person

Human in the Loop Was Never the Real Question. Where the Human Stands Is.

Keeping a human in the loop by reviewing every file rebuilds the bottleneck agents remove. The 2026 operating question for lenders is where judgment should sit, not whether a person is involved.
View Insight
Grouped bar chart showing faster-moving financial firms lead incumbents 47% to 30% in advanced AI adoption and 19% to 6% at the fully transforming stage.

Everyone in Finance Adopted AI. Almost No One Rebuilt the Operation.

Process automation runs at 79% of financial firms, but only 14% call AI transformational. For alternative lenders, the gap between adopting tools and rebuilding the operation is the next competitive edge.
View Insight
For every 100 companies that plan to run AI agents, about 11 actually operate them, shown as an 11 percent solid segment against an 89 percent planned-but-not-running segment.

Your Servicing Platform Will Ship You Agents This Year. That Is Not the Same as an Automated Operation.

By 2026, 40% of enterprise apps ship with AI agents built in. For alternative lenders, presence is not production: embedded agents optimize one system while the cross-system process stays manual.
View Insight
Grouped bar chart showing 42% of finance work is fully automatable and 19% is mostly automatable with current technology, a combined 61% ceiling reachable only at the function level.

Automating Tasks Is Not Automating a Function. Most Lenders Have Confused the Two.

Most lenders have automated tasks, not functions. The 2026 data shows why that gap keeps the cost in place, and what automating a full function actually requires.
View Insight
Stat panels showing 88% of services leaders trust AI outputs while 89% still verify them by hand

Your Firm Does Not Have an AI Problem. It Has a Data Problem AI Cannot Fix.

Services firms trust their AI outputs and re-check them by hand at the same time. The constraint is not the tool, it is fragmented data. Here is what actually moves the productivity gap.
View Insight
Bar chart showing 160% average ROI for firms with three or more AI use cases in production versus 40% for a single deployment

AI Is Not Killing the Billable Hour. It Is Exposing That You Were Never Selling Hours.

AI is not killing the billable hour. It is exposing that firms were pricing the input, not the outcome. Why margin now moves to the firms that redesign delivery before they touch the rate sheet.
View Insight
Bar chart showing 76% of finance leaders plan to invest in agentic AI in 2026 while only 6% report broad-scale implementation, illustrating the execution gap.

The Question Is Not Whether Your Agents Can Act. It Is Who Answers When They Do.

Agentic AI in lending is no longer a capability problem. Only 6% of finance leaders report broad-scale implementation, and governance is the barrier. Here is why accountability has to be designed in at build time.
View Insight
Visual showing the gap between companies using AI tools and companies that have redesigned workflows for autonomous agent execution

Your Org Chart Was Built to Coordinate Humans. That's Now a Competitive Liability.

78% of companies use AI. 80% report no earnings impact. The problem isn't the technology. It's the workflow structure AI is running inside
View Insight
Bar chart showing the gap between companies experimenting with AI agents and companies that have scaled agentic AI to measurable operational value

Only 10% of Companies Using AI Are Actually Changing Their Cost Structure

Nearly two-thirds of companies have tried AI agents. Fewer than 10% restructured their operations. Here's what the 10% actually did differently.
View Insight

Ready to put agentic AI to work?

See where automation can take the manual, repetitive work off your team. Book a discovery call and we'll map the highest-impact processes in your operation.

Book a discovery call